Loading...
Loading...
20 sbc devices tested with Nanobot. See which ones run it best.
Budget ARM SBC from Pine64. 4GB RAM is enough for lightweight forks. Decent community support.
Nanobot is light enough. Plenty of headroom on 4GB.
Python works on RISC-V Linux. 8GB gives plenty of headroom.
Nanobot barely uses 256MB. Tons of headroom here.
Nanobot on RISC-V with 8GB. Solid.
Python on RISC-V Linux. 8GB gives plenty of room.
Nanobot has tons of headroom on 4GB.
Nanobot runs easily with lots of headroom.
Overkill. Multiple Nanobot instances could run simultaneously.
Python runtime uses ~200MB. 8GB leaves plenty for the OS and MCP servers.
Nanobot runs well with headroom to spare.
Nanobot fits easily. TPU could accelerate specific ML tasks.
Nanobot is trivial for this hardware.
Nanobot runs easily. 8 TOPS DSP could accelerate specific tasks.
Nanobot is trivial on this hardware.
Works but uses most of the 512MB. Close monitoring needed.
Nanobot fits in 256MB. 2GB total leaves room for the OS.
Nanobot works within 256MB. 2GB is enough to run both Nanobot and the OS.
Technically possible but painfully slow. Frequent OOM crashes.
1GB minus OS leaves maybe 600MB for Nanobot. Works but fragile.
512MB shared with OS. Nanobot works but OOM kills are common under load.
Pine64 ROCK64 is a top pick based on compatibility verdicts and benchmark performance across tested devices in this category.
20 sbc devices have official compatibility verdicts for Nanobot.
See /can/nanobot/run-on/pine64-rock64 for specs, requirements, and benchmarks.