Loading...
Loading...
17 sbc devices tested with NanoClaw. See which ones run it best.
The sweet spot for OpenClaw. Genuine headroom for multi-channel messaging and automation.
Plenty of RAM for container isolation with multiple groups.
Docker support works well. Plenty of headroom for container isolation.
Container isolation with 16GB is smooth. Multiple groups run concurrently.
Container isolation with 16GB RAM works great.
Container isolation works smoothly. 8GB is comfortable.
Docker on x86 is the best-supported path. 8GB is comfortable.
Container isolation with GPU acceleration.
Container overhead is noticeable but functional with 1-2 groups.
Docker on RISC-V is experimental. Works but expect rough edges.
Container isolation works. Comfortable with 1-2 conversations.
Docker works. RISC-V container ecosystem is improving fast.
Container isolation works with 1-2 conversations.
Docker on RISC-V is still maturing. Works but expect occasional issues.
Docker works well. Hardkernel's mainline support is excellent.
Docker works. 4GB handles single-group isolation fine.
Docker works but the TI BSP can be finicky. 4GB is adequate.
Container overhead on 512MB is brutal. Frequent swapping.
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB) is a top pick based on compatibility verdicts and benchmark performance across tested devices in this category.
17 sbc devices have official compatibility verdicts for NanoClaw.
See /can/nanoclaw/run-on/raspberry-pi-5-8gb for specs, requirements, and benchmarks.